December 03, 2002
Sturm-Liouville problems

We may apply further assumptions to our string vibration model to add realism and generality. In the simplest version, we assumed constant elasticity, no external forces (like gravity), and the like. It is possible to introduce such factors (p for density, q for external forces and r as another factor less easy to describe), and after similar calculations in the previous example, we end up with the following for the position equation:

-(p(x) y'(x))' + q(x) y(x) = k r(x) y(x)

where p, q and r are given functions of x, and we also assume that p and r are positive functions (meaning they only take values greater than zero). Note that the way the brackets are arranged, we take p times the derivative of y, then take the derivative of the result, which gives a second derivative term. If we now add the boundary conditions:

a y(0) + b y'(0) = 0
c y(1) + d y'(1) = 0

a, b, c and d are given constants, and k is the eigenparameter. This is a second-order differential equation on the interval from 0 to 1. It appears all over the place in physics, where the functions p, q and r represent certain physical quantities. This is called the regular Sturm-Liouville problem, and it has been a focus in terms of what I've been learning over the last year.

This problem was originally studied after it popped out of new heat transfer models developed in the 1840's, and has remained an object of research ever since. Those studying the problem are interested in what happens to the eigenvalues and solutions (or even if any exist) given different properties of the coefficient functions and by messing around with the boundary conditions.

Posted by warcode at December 03, 2002 11:11 AM
Comments

...and more specifically, how does one use this theory to model the frequency at which I vibrate/jitter/resonate given: t equals time elapsed since I started drinking this cola, s equals amount of sleep I had last night, w equals work (amount of) I should be doing as I type this and p is a procrastination coefficient <1.

Posted by: r. on December 4, 2002 04:00 PM

You might say that his successors kind of lost their way . . . but if Liouville were alive today, I'm sure you would be an object of intense study.

Posted by: warcode on December 4, 2002 07:07 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?